|
IVF Success Rates IVF Pricing Options In Vitro Fertilization Egg Donation General Infertility Site Index Become a Patient
|
Hydrosalpinx pictures - blocked fallopian tubes dilated with fluid in infertile womenLaparoscopy and ultrasound photos and discussion of effects of hydrosalpinx on IVF success rates Advanced
Fertility Center of Chicago Background A hydrosalpinx is a blocked fallopian tube that is filled with fluid. It can be dilated to varying degrees from the accumulated fluid. Doctors can diagnose a hydrosalpinx in several ways including ultrasound, surgery such as laparoscopy, or with a specialized x-ray test called a hysterosalpingogram, or HSG. Tubal blockage and tubal infertility is usually a result of previous pelvic infection such as pelvic inflammatory disease, but also can be caused by endometriosis and other conditions. Because fertility specialists are lazy, they often use the nickname "hydro". Women with bilateral (both sides) tubal damage and hydrosalpinx are infertile and will need either tubal surgery, such as neosalpingostomy, or in vitro fertilization in order to get pregnant. Hydrosalpinx and IVF success rates If a woman going through IVF has a hydrosalpinx visible by ultrasound, then the average expected IVF success rate is lower as compared that expected in a similar patient without a hydrosalpinx. If there is are bilateral hydrosalpinges (hydros on each side - the plural of hydrosalpinx is hydrosalpinges) visible on ultrasound, studies have shown that the expected IVF success rate is even lower than with a hydro on one side. The medical studies on hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome agree that there is a decrease in success rates, but they do not all agree on the amount of the decrease caused by the presence of the hydro. In general, studies suggest that the chances for a live birth are about 20-30% reduced with a hydro present that is visible on ultrasound. So if a 30 year old woman with tubal infertility is having IVF at a fertility clinic with a 50% live birth rate for patients such as herself with no hydro, then if she has a hydro and does not get it removed, we should expect her chances for the first IVF cycle resulting in a live birth to be about 35-40% (70-80% of the 50% success rate). If the IVF center she chooses has a 30% live birth rate for such cases without hydros, then we should expect her chances for success with a hydro present for one IVF cycle to be about 21-24% (70-80% of the 30% success rate). IVF success rates vary significantly between different centers - it is wise to research IVF live birth rates carefully before choosing a clinic for the treatment. It is believed that hydrosalpinx fluid may have a toxic effect on the lining of the uterine cavity, or directly on the embryos, or both. It is also possible to have compromise from a "flushing" effect. Fluid from the tube can sometimes leak back into the uterine cavity. This could displace the embryos from the proper area in the uterus if it occurred at a critical time before the embryos are firmly implanted. The good news is that careful ultrasound examination
should be able to detect a significant hydrosalpinx. Studies have shown that if
surgery is performed to remove the fallopian tube (or tubes), the expected IVF
success rate is then normalized. Another approach that is effective is
disconnecting the tube from the uterus and leaving it in the body. This is often
done in cases with severe scarring where it is difficult to completely remove
the tube. Some IVF doctors insist that women with hydros have
laparoscopic surgery to remove or disconnect them
from the uterus prior to performing in vitro fertilization. Other fertility
specialists will counsel the patients about the potential risks and benefits of
having the surgery before the IVF:
Below is an ultrasound picture of the same woman's tube
|
|
|