Tubal Factor Infertility Tests and Treatment

Advanced Fertility Center of Chicago
Infertility and IVF Specialist Clinic
Gurnee & Crystal Lake, Illinois

Tubal factor infertility accounts for about 20-25% of all cases of infertility. This category includes cases in which the woman has completely blocked fallopian tubes and also women who have either one blocked tube or no tubal blockage but tubal scarring or other tubal damage.

Tubal factor infertility is usually caused by either pelvic infection, such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) or pelvic endometriosis. Sometimes it can be caused by scar tissue that forms after pelvic surgery.

In cases of relatively minor tubal damage it can be difficult to be certain that the infertility problem is solely due to the tubal damage. There may be other significant contributing causes that are resulting in the problem conceiving. In general, the standard infertility testing is performed on all couples and if no other cause of infertility is found, the presumptive diagnosis can be tubal factor. However, if the degree of tubal scarring is very minimal, a diagnosis of unexplained infertility could be warranted.

As IVF success rates have improved dramatically over the last 20 years, IVF has become the mainstay of treatment for tubal infertility. More details about in vitro fertilization pros and cons for tubal problems are below on this page.

Hydrosalpinx, fallopian tube that is blocked and dilated with fluid
This is evidence of previous pelvic inflammatory disease - PID

Pelvic inflammatory disease is usually caused by invasion of either gonorrhea or chlamydia from the cervix up to the uterus and tubes. The infection in these tissues causes an intense inflammatory response. Bacteria, white blood cells and other fluids (pus) fill the tubes as the body combats the infection. Eventually, the body wins and the bacteria are controlled and destroyed. However, during the healing process the delicate inner lining of the tubes (tubal mucosa) is permanently scarred. The end of the tube by the ovaries may become partially or completely blocked, and scar tissue often forms on the outside of the tubes and ovaries. All of these factors can impact ovarian or tubal function and the chances for conception in the future. If pelvic inflammatory disease is treated very early and aggressively with IV antibiotics, the tubal damage might be minimized, and fertility maintained.

Another problem seen after PID is tubal ectopic pregnancy. The rate of ectopic pregnancy in women with previous known PID is increased 6-10 times higher than in women with no previous history of PID.

A published study of 745 women with one or more episodes of PID that attempted to conceive showed that 16% of the women were infertile from tubal occlusion. Of those that conceived, 6.4% had ectopic pregnancies.

The diagnosis of tubal factor infertility is initially investigated in most cases with a hysterosalpingogram. This is an x-ray examination performed in the radiology department of the hospital in which contrast material (dye) is injected through the cervix to the uterine cavity. If the fallopian tubes are open the dye flows into the tubes and then spills out to the abdominal cavity. This is documented in a series of x-ray images during the procedure.

However, just because the fallopian tubes are found to be open by this "plumbing" test this does not mean that tubal function is normal. The inside lining of the fallopian tube can be severely damaged even though the tube is open and dye spills into the abdominal cavity on the hysterosalpingogram. Open but scarred tubes may not be able to perform the necessary functions to result in establishment of a normal intrauterine pregnancy. Proper tubal function allows egg pickup and transport, fertilization, and subsequent embryo transport from the fallopian tube down into the uterus where the embryo would implant.

If egg pickup, transport, and fertilization occur properly, but the tubal damage does not allow proper transport of the embryo to the uterus, implantation may occur in the tube resulting in a tubal pregnancy.

Laparoscopy can be performed to diagnose tubal damage other than complete tubal blockage.

Tubal catheterization utilizing a special scope can also be done to assess the status of the mucosal lining of the inside of the tubes.

The decision to have one of these therapies for tubal infertility should be based on several factors which your reproductive endocrinologist (fertility specialist) should discuss with you. The most significant issues are success rate considerations, the degree of tubal damage, the age of the female, and whether other infertility factors (male or female) are present. Medical insurance issues, economic considerations and procedure related discomfort and time off work with the different treatment approaches are also important.

Some general considerations regarding tubal surgery vs. in vitro fertilization IVF are listed below:

Issue	IVF	Surgery
Covered by insurance	*Usually not (some states in the US have a mandate requiring insurance plans to cover IVF)*	Sometimes
Time off work	1-2 days	3 days to 6 weeks
Requires injectable medicines	Yes	No
Requires multiple office visits for monitoring	Yes	No
Pregnancy rates (live births)	Factors that influence success rates include: Female age, egg quantity and quality, status of the tubes, pregnancy rates at that specific IVF center At some centers (such as ours) as high as 60-70% per embryo transfer procedure for young women (under 35)	Depends: See table on tubal surgery page
		Mild tubal damage: 40-70% after 12 months
		Moderate tubal damage: 20-40% after 12 months
		Severe tubal damage: 10-25% after 12 months
Time after procedure until knowing if successful	2 weeks	1-2 years
Risk of tubal pregnancy	About 1-2% of pregnancies	10-25% Depends: See table on tubal surgery page
Risk of multiple pregnancy	Factors that influence multiple pregnancy rates include: Number of embryos transferred, female age, egg quantity and quality, pregnancy rates at that specific IVF center Varies greatly by center and female age, some centers are very aggressive and transfer higher numbers of embryos At our clinic we now see about 75% single pregnancies, 23% twins and 2% triplets By transferring a maximum of 2 blastocysts, we can (almost) eliminate triplet pregnancies	If no ovarian stimulating drugs are used: 1% twins 99% single

The pros and cons of tubal reversal surgery versus IVF for women who have had their tubes tied, clipped, or burned (previous tubal ligation) are discussed on the tubal reversal versus IVF page.

In vitro fertilization is a treatment option that bypasses the tubal problem instead of attempting a repair.

With in vitro fertilization, sperm and eggs are mixed together in the laboratory and then the resulting embryos are transferred to the woman's uterus. Pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization for tubal factor infertility in women under 39 years old are usually very good because these women are relatively unlikely to have additional infertility problems, or egg related problems.